It seems like a contradiction. How do we eliminate our dog’s misbehavior with positive reinforcement?
The first step is to focus on what you want your dog to do rather than on what you don’t want him to do. This approach works with all misbehavior, but let’s look at one example in particular: the dog who menaces visitors with barking and growling. We know the problem, but let’s not focus on it. Instead, let’s ask ourselves what we’d like to see the dog do when visitors come over instead of barking and growling. Quietly lying in his crate might be an excellent alternative. Great. Let’s use positive reinforcement training to teach the dog to go lie in his crate when guests arrive. We’ve replaced the misbehavior with something better.
Old-fashioned trainers will balk at this idea. Why? Dr. Susan Friedman, professor of psychology at Utah State University, says it’s simply “the perennial gap between research and practice.” Trainers, even some on TV, focus heavily on the dog’s misbehavior. They’re constrained by forceful practices aimed at suppressing what they don’t want the dog to do. Behavior scientists have known for decades that punishment has limitations and side effects. Dogs subjected to these methods often withdraw from social interaction, have suppressed responses to training cues, escalate their aggressive responses, or develop generalized fear (Friedman, 2001).
But what about safety? If we don’t focus on the aggression problem, aren’t we putting people at risk of being bitten? Foregoing archaic methods does not mean we are being gratuitous or precarious in our training. Instead, at every step, we block our dog’s access to repeating the unwanted behavior. In the example at hand, we avoid surprise visitors while we build up the behavior of lying in the crate. As needed, we’d use a leash, baby gate, or other barrier to protect visitors while we refine the fluency of the crate-lying behavior. As we progress, we add other behaviors related to teaching our dog calm confidence when visitors are present. We’re safe and we’re smart.
And there’s a bonus with all this. Just as harsh training has its deleterious side effects (sometimes called “fall out”), positive reinforcement training has its emotional benefits. Dogs trained with praise, smiles, and well-timed food treats are more engaged socially, respond with vigor to training, and respond more reliably with reduced aggression. This is where research and training practices merge.
As always, behavior change in our dogs starts with human behavior change. Focus on behavior solutions rather than getting mired in behavior problems. When we take responsibility for our dogs’ learning, we take on an advocacy role for them aw well. We step out from under the burden of having to be a master, and step up to the experience of being a companion and a teacher.
Michael Baugh CDBC helps families with aggressive dogs in Sedona, Arizona
The Facts About Punishment, Susan Friedman PhD 2001
Functional Assessment: Hypothesizing Predictors and Purposes of Problem Behavior to Improve Behavior-Change Plans, Susan Friedman PhD 2009


